Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Thursday, August 6, 2020

Book Review: God by Reza Aslan

     

Publisher: Random House Publishing Group
Date of Publication: April 9, 2019
Pages: 320


     
 

      God: A Human History is a profound look at the depiction of he Divine since humans evolved and began recording things.  The author has a talent for taking complicated historical, archaeological and religious concepts and making them understandable to the non-academic.  The other attractive feature of this book is that the author shares his own personal faith journey and how he arrived at his current personal view of the divine.  

     In the Introduction, Aslan states that it is NOT the purpose of the book to prove the existence of God.  Belief in a divine being is faith, which the author elaborates is a personal choice for each of us.  What he tries to do in this book is to show how we have always tried to humanize the divine.  In fact, he states: “The entire history of human spirituality can be viewed as one long, interconnected, ever-evolving, and remarkably cohesive effort to make sense of the divine by giving it our emotions and our personalities….  In short, by making God us.”

     The book is divided into three parts: The Embodied Soul, The Humanized God, and What Is God?  In the first section, the author analyzes cave drawings found in Europe and identifies the earliest image ever found of God (the Sorcerer image from the Paleolithic Era found in France).  This and other drawings lead researchers to conclude that our ancestors shared an animistic belief that all living things are interconnected, that they all share in the same universal spirit.  This Sorcerer also represents the “God of the Beasts”, a concept which arose in multiple primitive cultures simultaneously.  The scientific debate regarding the origin of religion or religious thought began in earnest in the nineteenth century.  This coincided with Darwin’s introduction of concepts such as “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest.”  Is the development of religion an evolutionary adaptation?  The debate amongst anthropologists, social and other scientists continues today.  There is no doubt, however, that a “religious impulse” is present across many cultures and societies and developed in these different scenarios at similar paces.  The concept of a “soul” was the first religious belief which developed in humans.  The origin of our religious impulse, then is the result of “our ingrained, intuitive, and wholly experiential belief that we are, whatever else we are, embodied souls.”  The universal belief in the existence of the soul, then, “led to the concept of an active, engaged, divine presence that underlies all of creation.”  This concept of the divine presence was gradually personalized and eventually gave way to the single divine personality we know today as God.

     The second section of the book, “The Humanized God,” shows how different faith traditions added layers of human characteristics to their concept of the Divine.  Aslan concludes by saying “that what began as an unconscious cognitive impulse to fashion the divine in our image – to give it our soul – gradually became, over the next ten thousand years of spiritual development a conscious effort to make the gods more and more human like – until, at last, God became literally human.”  It is fascinating the way the author shows us cultures, such as the Greeks, who developed “lofty persons” or high gods and lesser gods, each representing some aspect of human nature.  He also introduces the concept of politicomorphism, or the divinization of earthly politics.  Aslan states: “In each case, in every empire, and throughout all of Mesopotamia, as politics on earth changed, the politics of heaven changed to match.  Just as in the face of fear and terror, the free citizens of Mesopotamia’s independent city states abandoned their primitive democracy and  voluntarily handed absolute power to their kings, so, too, did the citizens of heaven make one or another of the gods the unchallenged ruler over the rest.  Theology shifted to conform to reality, and the heavens became an amplified projection of the earth.”

     The third section of the book: “What is God?” consists of three chapters: “God is One”, “God is Three” and “God is All”.  In the first of these chapters Aslan adroitly explains the development of the concept of monotheism, tracing the Hebrew God back to Abraham and through Moses.  In the second chapter we learn of the conundrum of early Christianity: was Jesus fully human, fully divine, or both?  If He is divine, how does that reconcile with the Jewish tradition of monotheism?  The divinity of Jesus is broached in the Gospel of John and reconciled by the Council of Nicea in 325 C.E. and, finally, in the writings of Augustine of Hippo.  The concept of the Trinity was born: God is eternal and unchanging, but nevertheless exists in three forms: Father, Son and Holy Spirit.  All three share the same measure of divinity and all three existed at the beginning of time.  As Aslan states: “And if this idea causes confusion, if it defies logic and reason, if it seems to contradict the very definition of God, then it is simply the task of the believer to accept it as a mystery and move on.”  Aslan further opines that this humanization of the divine in the concept of the Trinity put Christianity on a collision course with the final monotheistic tradition which would come about 100 years later: Islam.  The third chapter, “God is All” is a concise summary of the rise of Islam and Muhammad’s return to the monotheism of the Jewish tradition.  To Muhammad, God is indivisible, and further, Muhammad attempted to dehumanize the divine.  Islam has no images or caricatures of God.  The Quran does not proclaim that humans are made in God’s image and Muslims deny the concept of the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus.  Aslan then goes on to describe the development of Sufism, a mystical version of Islam.  In Sufism, God is recognized as inseparable with His creation, creating a form of pantheism (God is everywhere).  He goes on to state: “These Sufis were claiming unity with the divine,  Indeed, for most Sufis, the mistake of Christianity lies not in violating the indivisible nature of God by transforming God into a human being;  rather, it lies in believing that God is only one particular human being and no other.  According to Sufism, if God is truly indivisible, then God is all beings, and beings are God.”  He concludes with “God is not the creator of everything that exists.  God is everything that exists.

   In his Conclusion, Aslan makes the case for his pantheism, which he came to through Sufism.  He reiterates the main themes of the book: the universal primitive belief in a “soul” separate from our physical selves which led to our belief in a divine being; the propensity to humanize this divine being as evidenced by multiple independent cultures; the development of the concept of monotheism which was reconciled with the divine/human Jesus of Nazareth through the evolution of the concept of the Trinity; the return to “true” monotheism and rejection of the Trinity and divinity of Jesus by Muhammad; and finally, the idea of pantheism (God is present in all of His Creation) exhibited by the pantheism of Sufism.  This long and winding road actually mirrors the author’s own spiritual journey as he notes in the conclusion.    


Wednesday, March 11, 2020

Book Review: Truth Over Fear: Combatting the Lies about Islam by Charles Kimball



Truth Over Fear: Combating the Lies About Islam

Author: Charles Kimball
Publisher: Westminster John Knox Press
Date of Publication: August 20, 2019
Pages: 158

     This little book is exactly what it purports to be.  It is a primer of basic and accurate information about Islam and gives the reader a fundamental knowledge base to be able to begin to comprehend the broad similarities as well as the intrinsic differences between Islam, Christianity and Judaism.  More importantly, Truth Over Fear allows the reader to listen critically to politicians, news media and other speakers and be able to spot the distortions and misrepresentations (as well as outright untruths) about Islam.  We used this book in our adult Sunday School at Outer Banks Presbyterian Church to begin a study of comparative religions and to initiate a program to promote inter-faith dialogue in our community.  The book was very successful in stimulating constructive, positive discussions and understanding about Islam.

     Charles Kimball is the Presidential Professor and Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, Oklahoma.  He has extensive experience living and working in the Middle East and has worked tirelessly to promote interfaith understanding and dialogue.  He has written other books which are useful in small group settings, including When Religion Becomes Evil: Five Warning Signs, published in 2008.

     In the author's Introduction, he discusses the misinformation promulgated by politicians, religious leaders and others and suggests that we need a new paradigm for thinking about and interacting with Muslims.  In the first chapter he gives us constructive religious responses to Islamophobia and discusses the Biblical mandate for positive interfaith relationships.  Chapter Two gives a very good explanation of the Five Pillars of Islam.  The Five Pillars are: Statement of Faith, Five Daily Prayers, Fasting, Alms Giving and Hajj, or holy pilgrimage.  Kimball in this chapter also iterates the similarities and differences between Islam and Judaism as well as Christianity.  He stresses that Muslims consider their God (the Arabic word for God is Allah) to be the same God of Abraham and Isaac.  Muhammad's revelations from God are thought to be the final ones in the line that started with Abraham and continued through Moses and the Prophets of the Old Testament and Jesus in the New Testament.  Jesus is seen as one of the great prophets but in Islam, Jesus is not considered divine (neither is Muhammad).  Islam does not believe in the Resurrection of Jesus and does not believe in the Trinity.  The Five Pillars, however, stress many of the fundamental concepts of the Judeo-Christian tradition, taking care of the less fortunate being just one.

     Chapter Three is entitled: "Conflict and Cooperation" and traces the development of attitudes towards Islam, Muhammad and Muslims in general from the time of Muhammad (around 620 A.D.) until the late 20th Century.  In a very succinct summary, Kimball presents the geographic, economic and political forces which created a fearful and extremely hostile perception of Islam in Europe.  The writings of Dante and Martin Luther are used as examples of the negative dialogue which prevailed.  Enlightenment and Post-Enlightenment thought represented a softening of the negative rhetoric about Islam, but the stereotypical representations of Islam as militant and evil remained.

     Chapter Four is entitled "The World We Actually Live In" and stresses the complexity of the world's religions (including Islam) today and how few people (especially those in charge of foreign policy) understand these complexities.  Kimball states that generic remedies for real or perceived problems include thinly veiled racism or bigotry aimed at groups deemed inferior (such as Muslims) and that people faith and goodwill must be willing to challenge the easy stereotypes and deeply rooted biases about Islam and its 1.7 billion followers.  We saw in the previous chapter how these stereotypes and biases evolved over centuries.  In this chapter the author discusses the diversity in Islam including the differences between Sunnis and Shi'ites and even differences within these sub-groups.  He also gives a cincise definition of Sharia and Jihad and clears up many misconceptions about both.  He ends this chapter with a discussion of Islam in America.

     The concluding two chapters enumerate how interfaith dialogue and improved relations have been attempted on an international scale and how that can be brought to the community and congregation level.  Kimball notes how the Christian mission mandate has changed over the last 50 years which corresponds to the great ecumenical efforts of the World Council of Churches and the Roman Catholic Church through the directives of Vatican II.   Mission work is now seen as an ecumenical effort to witness, serve and dialogue rather than proselytize and convert.  Interestingly, Islam is also a missionary religion which comes directly from the Five Pillars.

     Kimball does not ignore the radical Muslim extremists responsible for the attacks of 9/11 as well as the horrible activities in Afghanistan and elsewhere.   He discusses this and notes that other religious traditions (including Christianity) have extremists as well.  He notes that "Knowing something of the fullness of one's own religious tradition makes it easier to continue to think generically of its ideal and assign repugnant behavior to the marginal extremes."  In other words, it's easy to dismiss these extremists as "not true Christians" or "not true Muslims".  The author further states: "you cannot remove large groups of people with whom you disagree from your broader religious community."  In order to understand these concepts of extremism and how to react to it, our class is next going to study Reza Aslan's Beyond Fundamentalism: Confronting Extremism in the Age of Globalization.  Stay tuned for more on this topic.



     In summary, Kimball's book is an excellent starting point.  If you stop here you will have a basic understanding of Islam and be able to confront the erroneous statements made by less informed individuals.  It is also a great jumping off point to learn more about the world we live in today.  I recommend it highly.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

"I Thirst"



"I Thirst"

(A Meditation on John 19:28-29)

"After this, when Jesus knew that all was now finished, he said (in order to fulfill the scripture), 'I am thirsty.'  A jar full of sour wine was standing there.  So they put a sponge full of the wine on a branch of hyssop and held it to his mouth."


    This fourth statement from the Cross is different from all of the other statements.  It is the first signal of physical distress from Jesus in the Passion Narrative.  It is only mentioned in the Gospel of John, possibly because John was positioned closest to the Cross and may have been the only apostle to hear this desperate, probably whispered plea.

     Some writers say that this statement is intentionally included in John's Gospel in order to announce fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy:  In Psalm 69, for instance, the Suffering Servant states "They gave me vinegar for my thirst."   This intentional statement from Jesus would fit John's portrait of Jesus as in total control of events. 

     Some feel this plea is inlcuded to demonstrate Jesus' human-ness - that he suffered a human, physical pain on the Cross.

     I wonder if Jesus wasn't giving us a clue as to where to find Him once His physical human being was no longer with us.

     We would find Him in people who are in need:  People who suffer an actual thirst like our brothers and sisters in Malawi whom missionaries from our church have helped build wells.

     We would find Him in people who are in need:  People who have a spiritual thirst for knowledge  of our Lord and Savior, a thirst for the Good News of our Salvation which was given to us by God through the exquisite sacrifice of his Son.

     The more I thought about "I Thirst", however, the more I was struck by Jesus' human-ness.  Growing up, my image of Jesus was from a Renaissance painting: halo, radiant garments, walking on water.  I can't help but dwell on the human Jesus.   Yes, He was and IS God, but the miracle is that He was also a very real and knowable man - a human who had feelings and experienced physical pain...   JUST LIKE YOU AND ME.

John also tells us that Jesus grew tired after a long journey...  JUST LIKE YOU AND I WOULD.

Matthew tells yus of Jesus' hunger after His forty day fast...  JUST LIKE YOU AND I WOULD BE.

Jesus wept at the tomb of Lazarus, His good friend who died before Jesus could see him one last time alive...JUST LIKE YOU OR I WOULD.

Jesus was thirsty after hours of torture and trauma, and relied on the help of strangers to help Him in his hour of need...  JUST LIKE YOU AND ME.

Jesus is God, but he was also very human...  JUST LIKE YOU AND ME.

He sacrificed his human life in a horribly painful and humiliating way...  FOR YOU AND ME.

AMEN

(This Mediation was delivered as part of a Tenebrae Service at Fist Presbyterian Church, Lynchburg, Virginia on Good Friday, April 3, 2015)

Friday, March 6, 2015

Book Review: The Book of Strange New Things by Michel Faber



The Book of Strange New Things

Author: Michel Faber
Publisher: Crown Publishing Group
Date of Publication: October 28, 2014
Pages: 500 (Hardcover Edition)

     This book is itself somewhat of a strange new thing.  The main character, Peter Leigh, is an Englishman, a recovered alcoholic, drug addict and petty criminal.  He reinvented himself as  a Christian minister after being befriended by a nurse during a convalescence.  This nurse becomes his wife and partner in his ministry until he is selected to go alone to another planet to spread the Word of Jesus to aliens on a recently colonized planet called Oasis.  The colonization project is run by a nebulous company identified only as USIC

     It takes a while for Peter to become acclimated to his new planet and even longer to meet and begin his work with his new parishioners.  The author does a masterful job of describing this new world, including details of agriculture, climate, topography and the native inhabitants, called "Oasans" by Peter.  Peter is able to communicate with his wife, Bea, via an inter-stellar e-mail.  Just as Peter's ministry begins to flourish, troubles at home strain his relationship with Bea.  As he desperately tries to reconcile his missionary success with his personal failures, suspicion regarding the motives of USIC muddy the waters.  

     One can't help but be reminded of Mary Doria Russel's The Sparrow.  In The Sparrow the missionary is a Jesuit priest and the theology espoused is most definitely Ignatian.  In The Books of Strange New Things Peter's denomination is never characterized other than "Christian" and the religious concerns bounce around from issues of faith, suffering, redemption and salvation and even predestination.  There is not a particular theology presented, although the Bible is thoroughly explored as Peter translates Jesus' parables and teachings (Oasans prefer the New Testament).   

     The Book of Strange New Things is a marvelous exploration into faith and sharing.  It raises serious issues of being so concerned with others that you lose track of what's going on to those right next to you and trying to find that balance of saving the world but being true to your own relationships. 

Friday, December 12, 2014

Book Review: When Religion Becomes Evil: Five Warning Signs by Charles Kimball



When Religion Becomes Evil

Author: Charles Kimball
Publisher: HarperCollins
Date of Publication: October 13, 2009
Pages: 304 (Nook Edition)

    This author currently is the Presidential Professor and Director of Religious Studies at the University of Oklahoma in Norman, OK. Previous to this he was the Chair of the Department of Religion and the Divinity School at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, NC.  He is a graduate of Oklahoma State University and earned an M.Div. degree from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He is an ordained Baptist minister and also received his Th.D. from Harvard University in comparative religion with specialization in Islamic studies.  The reader also learns from this book that Professor Kimball has served as Director of the Middle East Office of the National Council of Churches and has traveled extensively in the region in that capacity.  He has met personally with the Ayatollah Khomeni during the Iran Hostage Crisis and is regarded as an expert on Islam and conflict in the Middle East.  He has more than adequate credentials to write this book.

    This edition is a re-issue of the original book which was published shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks.  Kimball has updated sections and included new examples of problematic religious practice.  This book is an excellent overview of religious fanaticism.  In the forward to this new edition the author addresses the current problem of widespread information which is without a coherent frame of reference for understanding and interpretation.  He attempts (and generally succeeds) in correcting that flaw and even better gives the reader "a gentle introduction to the critical study of comparative religion."  He also spends some time discussing "evangelical atheism" (Harris, Hitchens, Dawkins, etc...) and the thought that religion is the underlying problem to most of the world's ills.  These authors argue that religious world views are anachronistic and that religion itself is, therefore, irrelevant.  The author retorts that within religious traditions  "one finds the life-affirming faith that has sustained and provided meaning for millions over the centuries"  and therefore should not  be so summarily dismissed.  He also cites various authors including theologian Houston Smith and journalist Thomas Friedman. The author acknowledges that at the same time, there are corrupting influences that "lead toward evil and violence in the world."  The remainder of the book explores five major warning signs of human corruption of religion.  He notes that the inclination towards these corruptions is strong in the world's two major religions (Christianity and its 1.8 billion adherents as well as Islam with its 1.3 billion).  

     Kimball is very careful not to call any group evil.  His objective is to illustrate the warning signs that alert us to the potential for evil human behavior within the framework or justification of organized religion.   As he states: "The more effective we are at identifying dangerous patterns of corrupted religion the more likely people of good will can avert disaster inspired or justified by religion."  So what are these dangerous patterns we should look out for?

    The first is "Absolute Truth Claims":   "When zealous and devout adherents elevate the teachings and beliefs of their tradition to the level of absolute truth claims, they open a door to the possibility that their religion will become evil."    A contemporary example the author uses for this is when anti-abortionists support murder.  The author also notes that rigid truth claims, particularly in times of conflict, are the basis for demonizing and dehumanizing those who differ.    

     Secondly, we should be wary of the abuse of sacred texts.  Sacred texts, according to Kimball, are the most easily abused component of religion.  Further, "Manipulative exploitation of revered texts can lead to violent zealotry."  He notes that a highly selective reading and interpretation of the Qur'an is the foundation for the exceedingly powerful and destructive phenomenon of suicide bombings (including the 9/11 attacks). 

    The third red flag is the demand for blind obedience, often seen in religious cults and sects.  The author uses the example of the Aum Shinrikyo sect in Japan which was responsible for the sarin gas attacks in the Tokyo subway system in 1995.  Kimball notes that all religious traditions began as what we today would call a sect or a cult.  These sects and cults often follow a charismatic authority figure who demands blind obedience ("Exhibit A" being Jim Jones and The People's Temple which resulted in the 1978 mass suicide in Guyana). 

    The fourth signal is when religion tries to establish "the ideal time".  All religions, Kimball says, state that we are not living in an ideal time and that we should strive to identify what that is and how to attain it.

    Finally, religions can turn evil when they resort to an "end justifies any means" mentality.  This can come in response to defending a sacred space (The Crusades) or reinforcing group identity against "outsiders."  This can lead to racism, classism and sexism.  Protecting "The Institution" at all costs has led to such grievous events as The Inquisition and, more recently, the suppression of the sex abuse scandals in the Roman Catholic Church. 

    The author uses the rest of the book to explain and define the "Just War doctrine", especially as this might apply to the contemporary war on terror.  He also uses the end of the book to defend Islam as a religion of peace and explains the true meaning of jihad (striving or struggling in the way of God).  The concept of jihad has been corrupted by radical Islam in all of the ways Kimball has explained in the previous chapters in the book.    The author also takes one more opportunity to warn the reader that we must continuously pursue peace with justice and be wary when political leaders seek to justify policy on religious grounds.  He gives further advice on how religious people need a new paradigm both for the ways we function both within existing traditions and for our more contemporary multicultural and interfaith engagement.  He suggests that we think of God as a direction rather than an object, much as Stephen Covey has described God as a compass.  He also encourages us to embrace diversity as enriching rather than threatening and approach our fellow humans with the basics of faith, hope and love.  Kimball states: "As people of faith look toward the future in the Middle East and in their own communities, we would all do well to focus on the two-fold mandate to love God and to love our neighbor."

     This book is an excellent look at the frightening issue of evil in the world waged in the name of organized religion, told within the framework of the study of comparative religion.  The author does a great job of not singling out any particular religion for the spotlight.  Instead, he points out that all of the world's religions are human constructs and, as such, are equally susceptible to the corruptions he defines which lead to evil and horrific consequences. 

     When Religion Becomes Evil is an excellent introduction for individuals wanting a better understanding of radicalism within established religious traditions.  It also lends itself well to group study and discussion.

Sunday, June 30, 2013

Book Review: Help Thanks Wow The Three Essential Prayers by Anne Lamott



Help Thanks Wow
The Three Essential Prayers

Author: Anne Lamott
Publisher: The Penguin Group
Date of Publication:  November 13, 2012
Pages: 112 (Hardcover Edition)

      
     Anne Lamott has crafted another gem in her own quirky, humorous and genuine style.  Anyone who has read her previous essays on faith and religion (Traveling Mercies, Plan B and Grace) will recognize this sincere effort to share her personal journey and struggles with faith and notions of God, salvation and the hereafter.  She uses many of her own life experiences to illustrate the points she makes about what she calls the three essential prayers: Help, Thanks and Wow.  

   The author also uses insightful stories of how others have tried to resolve the same issues.  In the section on
"Help" she recounts :

     "I don't pray for God to do this or that or for God's sake to knock it off, or for specific outcomes.  Well, okay, maybe a little.  When my great hero Arthur Ashe had had AIDS for quite a while, he said: 'God's will alone matters.  When I played tennis, I never prayed for victory in a match.  I will not pray now to be cured of heart disease or AIDS.'  So I pray, Help. Hold my friends in your light."

   She also extols the virtue of intercessory prayer, saying "If one person is praying for you, watch out!  Things are going to start to happen!"  In the end, though,it is the author's self-deprecating and never ending sense of humor which enlightens and uplifts the reader such as when she calls grace "spiritual WD-40."  This is an unusual book about prayer, but one worthy of reading and much reflection.  It reminds the reader that no one has the answers and that we all must come to our own reasoned and self-sustaining "religion" which works for each of us.
     

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Book Review: The Creation by E.O. Wilson



The Creation
E.O. Wilson


            “More than 2 million tons of expired electronics are discarded in land fills each year, making ewaste the fastest growing fraction of the municipal garbage system.  These castoffs account for nearly 40 percent of the toxic heavy metals – like lead, cadmium, and mercury – found in dumps.”  Wired Magazine, Fall 2006.

            E.O. Wilson is an interesting contradiction.  He was brought up in a Southern Baptist household in rural Alabama and is now a Darwinian student of evolutionary biology.  He is a world renowned entomologist whose area of specialization is ants and has been a Harvard University Biology professor for 25 years.  Two previous books have won this author the Pulitzer Prize, “On Human Nature” in 1978 and “The Ants”, co-authored by Bert Holldobler in 1990. “The Creation” is a letter to an unnamed pastor (representing the religious or anti-evolutionist point of view) which lays out a very scientific, dispassionate argument for preserving all of nature’s species.  He documents the dramatic peril that living organisms currently face through citing current research.  He emphatically states: “According to estimates by a team of experts in 2004, climate changes alone, if left unabated, could be the primary cause of extinction of a quarter of the species of plants and animals on the land by mid-century.”  He calls our times an “ecological Dark Age.”  The author then laments the decline of the Earth’s biodiversity from a purely scientific standpoint and points his finger directly at one species responsible for this debacle: Homo Sapiens.  “We are the giant meteorite of our time, having begun the sixth mass extinction of Phanerozoic history.  We are creating a less stable and interesting place for our descendants to inherit.”  He then presents cogent arguments for reversing this trend citing, among other items, medical and health reasons to preserve the Creation rather than systematically destroy it.

            Throughout this fascinating and yet frightening book the author appeals to “the Pastor” in religious terms.  He discusses the quote from Genesis in which God gives humans dominion over all of Earth’s other species and expounds on how that caveat has been abused over time to allow us to plunder our natural resources.  The concept that humans are a higher order of being on theological grounds has sanctioned the exploitation of our co-inhabitors of the planet.  The author considers this flawed rationalization and blames it for what he describes as the “homogenization of the Earth’s ecosystem”, or declining biodiversity.  He appeals to the Pastor using his own religious vocabulary.  He calls on all humans to be stewards of this great gift, the Creation.  “The Creation is the greatest heritage other than the reasoning mind itself ever provided to humanity”.  On these grounds alone, the author reasons, the Creation should be celebrated and preserved.


            The last section of the book discusses the differences between secular and religious humanism.  There is an interesting harpooning of the concept of “Intelligent Design” as a default argument between the religious and scientific communities.  The real value of “The Creation” though is in these last few important pages of the book.  In these E. O. Wilson implores scientists and theologians to basically put aside their differences and celebrate their similarities.  Both camps have solid reasons to preserve the environment and Earth’s biodiversity despite differing bases for the same conclusions.  He calls for a better educated populace in the area of biology.  He calls for “all species inventories” to be undertaken so that we can more fully understand our world.  These inventories have already been started in areas such as the Great Smoky Mountains National Park using “citizen naturalists” to discover and catalog the living creatures in that area.  What a refreshing attitude!  The author is basically stating: “Let’s quit arguing over our philosophical differences which we will never resolve and move on to our common goal: preserving the environment!”  If this attitude would catch on in the political arena as well, can you imagine what a better “Creation” we would live in?

Friday, September 16, 2011

Pat Robertson and Alzheimer’s Disease as Justification for Divorce

Pat Robertson has uttered another outrageous commentary during a “700 Club” program on the Christian Broadcasting Network.  He advocated divorce if a spouse became incapacitated by Alzheimer’s disease, citing the disease as a “kind of death.”  (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/14/pat-robertson-divorce-alzheimers_n_963305.html)

Pat Robertson is a native Virginian (born in Lexington and a graduate of Washington and Lee University) and founder of the Christian Broadcasting Network in Virginia Beach.  He attended law school at Yale, was ordained as a minister in the Southern Baptist Church and ran an unsuccessful campaign for the Republican Presidential nomination in 1988.  When he ran for office he relinquished any church affiliation.  He remains, however, a prominent spokesperson for the “Christian right.”

I have had many patients over the years that have Alzheimer’s.  I have watched patients progress through the stages of this cruel disease as their personality was removed layer by layer like an onion peel   These patients also have other problems including vascular and heart disease, diabetes, etc.  The Alzheimer’s adds another dimension of risk because of the difficulties with compliance (remembering their medications, for instance), mobility issues and confusion.  These patients often exhibit fairly radical personality shifts as well.  A sweet, cooperative elderly gentleman can turn into a combative and argumentative patient very quickly.  I have been amazed over the years by the supportive, caring and loving spouses that often accompany these patients to visits.  They have more than likely been “covering” for their spouse for years, helping them stay organized and functional.  They are present when their loved one says something spontaneous which is often embarrassing or silly.  These spouses suffer social isolation when other folks stop having them over.  First and foremost, they watch as their partner for decades dissolves in front of their eyes.  They lose that companionship and support which is the hallmark of long standing relationship.  They lose life as they knew it. 

According to Pat Robertson, this is the time to punt and run.  Give up.  In his own words, when asked by a viewer of his “700 Club” program if it was alright for a man to see other people if his wife was incapacitated with Alzheimer’s, Robertson said “I know it sounds cruel, but if he's going to do something, he should divorce her and start all over again, but make sure she has custodial care and somebody looking after her.”  Cut your losses, start over, live a little.  Really? 

Where’s the honor and dignity in that?  Leave aside all religion, scripture and Beatitudes and look at it from a strictly moral point of view.  Is that really the right and moral thing to do?  Is that what you would want your spouse to do for you were you to become incapacitated by Alzheimer’s or any other disease?  Why limit it to Alzheimer’s dementia?  Extrapolate this thinking to stroke victims, people with multiple sclerosis or debilitating diabetes.    What’s next, euthanasia?   When did spouses become disposable possessions to be discarded when they don’t work like they used to like an old VHS player? 

I’ve got news for Mr. Robertson.  Everybody gets something.  Everybody dies, and before they do, they usually have some sort of illness that limits them.  It’s the rare bird that lives to a ripe old age and dies in their sleep without ever being seriously ill.  I, for one, am very grateful for a spouse who I know has and will be with me every step of the way, wherever that might lead.